Voice of the Faculty  


Newsletter of the UCLA Academic Senate 

 Vol. 13  No. 1 — November  2004
 

previous issue, May 2004


Legislative Assembly 
Tuesday, November 16, 2004
2:00-4:00 California Room Faculty Center
(all faculty urged to attend)


Senate Business
 The latest information from
 standing Senate groups. 


Commentary:  The Diversity Requirement: An Overview
by Raymond Knapp, Chair GE Governance and Secretary,
College FEC


Cliff's Corner 
2003-04 Senate Chair Cliff Brunk's update on systemwide Academic Senate issues.


Repositioning Information
Technology Initiative


Recent Developments in the Office for the Protection of Research Subjects and Institutional Review Boards
A letter from Roberto Peccei, Vice Chancellor for Research

Emeriti Newsletter

 

Highlights of Other News

  • The Senate Source, November 2004 -  the online publication for the University of California faculty published by the University of California Systemwide Senate.
     

  • Systemwide Senate Website Find out what's happening at the systemwide Senate. This is a key resource for system level issues.

 

The Voice of the Faculty is an electronic newsletter of the Academic Senate published the first week of November, February and May.

 

A Message from the Chair
 


 

Dear Colleagues,
 

I’d like to take this opportunity in our first Voice of the Faculty newsletter of the year to welcome everyone back.  This year, although difficult in terms of  budget, is at least not as bleak as the last few.  We will spend less time this year trying to come up with painful ideas for additional cuts and have a few more moments to concentrate on what we can do to improve the teaching, research and working conditions on campus. 

As you can see from the titles of articles listed to the left, a number of new initiatives are underway. 

The Academic Senate Office has been reorganized in order to make the budget cuts that were mandated for this year while trying to preserve the excellent level of assistance the staff has provided for many years.  New staff assignments are listed in this newsletter.  Additionally, we are working in the Senate to make more visible the progress of specific proposals through our various senate committees.  We are designing an electronic log that will allow faculty members to track their new degree program or name change or other request through the various committees.  The date an item arrives at and leaves the committee will be posted, as will the committee’s action and where the item was then sent.  Staff contact information will be listed with each committee. We hope this new tracking system will allow the faculty to follow the progress of any item under consideration and to be able to ask questions should they need to. One such issue for this year is the diversity requirement.

The faculty of the College will soon be voting on a diversity requirement, and the faculties of Arts & Architecture and Theater, Film and Television will soon follow with their own votes.  The issue of a diversity requirement has been carefully considered over several months by a group of faculty and students working together to arrive at the plan that we will vote on. I urge you to cast your ballot when you receive it. Speaking entirely personally, I feel the group has successfully managed to design a serious diversity requirement that will be possible to carry out even given our resource constraints. 

Three major initiatives that will affect the entire campus are also underway. The first is an experiment by the Committees on Research and Faculty Research Grants to revise the way in which we assign faculty research grants.  In the last two rounds of directed cuts mandated by the state legislature, research funds were hit very hard. Given the reduced funding available and the enormous input of faculty time in reviewing the grants (each of which required two separate readings for increasingly small sums of money), the committee has decided to try a new approach that is outlined in this issue.

The second initiative is a plan to study the ways in which we use information technology on campus to see if we might gain some efficiency in order to invest our IT funds more wisely.  (See Jim Davis’s article in this issue.)  I emphasize that this year’s activities are a study to see what we could and should do, not merely an attempt to consolidate.  We may well not need 50 different email systems on campus—but we may well need more than one.  This study is designed to see what we could do that would retain or improve the current level of service while achieving greater efficiency.  We will be calling directly for faculty input on this issue soon.

The third initiative is a reorganization of the Internal Review Boards on campus in order to improve their efficiency in dealing with faculty grants.  (See Vice-Chancellor Peccei’s article in this issue.)  This new system will be evaluated by an outside group this year as well as by faculty on campus.  All of this activity is part of our ongoing effort to do the best job of research and teaching that we possibly can with the resources we have.  Many faculty members across campus have been and will continue to be involved in these efforts.  We would welcome any feedback you might have on either initiative.

Finally, let me invite you to attend the first Legislative Assembly meeting of the 2004-05 academic year.  The meeting will take place on November 16, 2-4 p.m. in the California Room of the Faculty Center and will feature Chancellor Albert Carnesale who will give us his outlook for the university for the coming year.  I urge Legislative Assembly representative as well as the faculty at large to attend this meeting and have the opportunity to speak with the Chancellor.

I look forward to a very busy and productive year.  I appreciate the opportunity to work with my colleagues across campus and with the Chancellor and Executive Vice-Chancellor to see what we can accomplish.

 With best wishes,
Kathleen Komar

Chair, UCLA Academic Senate