Voice of the Faculty  


Newsletter of the UCLA Academic Senate 


|

 

 Vol. 15  No. 2 — June  2006

Previous Issue   Back Issues


 

Senate Quick Takes


Resumption of Contributions to the University of California Retirement Plan

Shane White, Faculty Welfare Committee Chair


Staff & Faculty Counseling Center:

An excellent resource for the UCLA community


The Search for a New Chancellor

Kathleen Komar, Immediate Past Chair


Meet Carolynne Hogg:  the Face Behind CAP


Highlights of Other News:

A Message from the Chair
 

Dear Colleagues:

I had hoped to be able to comment on the selection of a Chancellor for our campus, but as recent news reports have made clear, the process has not yet reached a successful conclusion.  President Dynes has said that the Advisory Committee will reconvene on June 5thI also recently learned that Acting Provost Rory Hume has been offered and accepted the post of Provost of the UC system, pending approval by the Regents.

While the future steps of the Advisory Committee to select our next chancellor are unknown at this time, we can look back at the steps that have already been taken.  The UCLA Academic Senate played a part in the process: besides providing the slate of names from which the UCLA faculty members on the Advisory Committee were chosen, the Senate also convened two groups of faculty to meet with the Committee.  These groups spoke to the Committee about important issues facing UCLA and the qualities we are looking for in a Chancellor; some of these comments were also provided to the Advisory Committee as written statements.  Elsewhere in this issue you will find a description of the process  that was followed by the Advisory Committee in bringing candidates forward to the President.  Clearly, the Advisory Committee members’ many hours of work have not yet yielded a positive outcome.  It is frustrating, but it is certainly not the first time a search has run into snags.

I do want to briefly express my disappointment about leaks to the news media.  Our search process is intended to be confidential so as not to deter any candidate of interest to us from being in the pool.  One can debate whether or not this is the best way to conduct a search; nonetheless, the candidates were in the pool with that understanding.  So I am deeply chagrined that leaks to the news media breached confidentiality, potentially embarrassed an apparent candidate and her husband, and made the task of attracting another candidate that much more challenging.

And now I look forward to a positive outcome of the next stage of the search.

Sincerely,

Adrienne

Chair, UCLA Academic Senate

 

Tell us what you think. After reading this issue of Voice of the Faculty. Send your RESPONSE
The Voice of the Faculty is an electronic newsletter of the Academic Senate published November, February and May.